<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [iDC] Collective Action</title></head><body>
<div>thanks for the resourcing. The scope of your 'collective
action'</div>
<div>jumps over the divide of ping-ponging and leaps to the cross
shooting</div>
<div>football field where aiming is focused and players
multiplied.</div>
<div>Thanks for inviting me to join the list. maybe i say a few words
here.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>In a recent panel "sites and para-sites" at ICA London,
a question from the audience. "what is the difference
between flickr and Harwood's 9 ?"</div>
<div>'sociable web media' and networked art. Is networked art still a
practiced genre? Keyworx, anybody?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>On the digital divide and participatory surveillace, I can not
help to</div>
<div>bring up Texas governer's virtual border patrol plan.</div>
<div>http://www.parapundit.com/archives/003511.html</div>
<div>in sports and game, we do participate.</div>
<div>If sociable web media would include online game
environment,</div>
<div>i dare suggest class and race is on the equal playground.</div>
<div>however, bandwidth and server location do come into play.</div>
<div>thus the worldcup football scope..hmmm..</div>
<div><font face="Geneva" size="+1">I refer to virtual marathon by
tsunamii.net</font></div>
<div><font face="Geneva" size="+1"
color="#0000FF"
>http://www.ntticc.or.jp/Archive/2005/Opennature/Works/virtualmaratho<span
></span>n.html</font></div>
<div><font face="Geneva" size="+1" color="#0000FF"><br></font></div>
<div>finally, the recent shutdown of UO's (university of openness)
wiki page (university of openness) due to overwhelming spam makes me
wonder-</div>
<div> who rules in the collective action?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>for now</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>sl</div>
</body>
</html>