<p style="text-indent: 0.5in;">Seeing that in this discussion (Kanarinka, etc.) many
are just entering the academic tunnel, I would like to contribute a little from
the vantage point of the exit. I retired 7 years ago after slowly dying during
32 years in an institution that started well. We were to take off were we
thought Antioch had stopped, "break
the lockstep of traditional education" as our mission stated in 1968. The three
decades plus spent on observing changes of mission, corruption, brown nosing
and decay, only served to teach me that there is no way to build a truly
progressive institution in the U.S. The rhetoric may be progressive, but the
core won't ever get there, and it is not only due to corporations, government,
bad administration and self-serving colleagues. Education in this country is
only a relatively true right for the people until high-school level. After that
it is a commodity in a profit making business. University profit comes of
course from the tuition students have to pay for the honor of getting a job to
help corporations make more profit. It comes from corporations themselves, that
sponsor projects that benefit them (government and army being part of that),
and it comes from non educational things like sports events. It is into this
picture we enter trying to educate people, without realizing that we can't
really balance a greed-based structure with our idealism. <span> </span>In terms of art education I figured that if I
had 5000 students over the years, maybe 20 of them managed to support a family with
their art. The 5000 ensured that I could survive as a professor. The other 4980
that didn't make it in the gallery circuit, hoped to survive teaching the same
way I did. If they managed to get a teaching job, each one of them would need another
5000 students to survive. We have a perfect pyramid scam here.</p>
<p style="text-indent: 0.5in;">I suggest a different utopia than the
attempt to find the precarious balance you are seeking or an impossible institutional
reform within the university. It is too late for all that. It might be much more realistic
to accept that the U.S.
universities are corporate tools that in fact are competing with
corporate training at a disadvantage. In art, the Whitney museum is training
its own artists and being better at it than many schools (partly due to better
filtering). Let us stop the hypocrisy and have corporations openly take over
education for "real life," making sure that students survive in the market. It
will provide a much better and up to date education. With this we would have a
true education for serving. Let us also have the government start from scratch and
create a free humanist education system that ensures that people learn about
cultures and ideas, how to speculate and how to make connections. This would be
the education for thinking. The student could be in both systems at the same
time and end up well rounded. Some of us are better at teaching skills than thinking,
and therefore would contribute in the first system. Some of us are better at
idealistic speculation and would be in the second. We all would lead much less
frustrating lives, be incredibly more productive, and present ourselves with a
constructive attitude to our students. Presently, those of us who are idealistic can
only teach (justified) resentment. Luis Camnitzer<br></p>
<br>