Ok - an anti-Keen manifesto .... he'd love it of course!<br><br>As Alfred North Whitehead wrote, 'it is always possible to work oneself into a state of
complete contentment with an ultimate irrationality'. So it seems with Andrew Keen. <br><br>Keen seems the true anti-Whiteheadian in "amateur capitalist" style (by which I mean one who relies on quick fame to make a quick buck before being exposed as pulling rather empty strings and levers as per the Wizard of Oz). He deals in caricature rather than the complexity of media experience, and seems to want to impose the restrictions of caricature on everyone else, if only to validate his own importance and elitism.
<br><br>Keen doesn't really seem worth reading because he ignores the basic objects of his enquiry (having pre-decided what they are). So beyond several interviews and some breathless media panics about social media pushed by leading newspapers who quite rightly feel threatened, I haven't read much Keen.
<br><br>However, in true Keen-style, I won't let that stop me making a few brief remarks.<br><br>In brief, Keen sounds like the kind of amateur in search of quick glory he pretends to deplore. All the rhetoric is the usual. The communists (!!), those who can't help themselves in their ignorance etc, the decline of culture ... while failing himself to analyse the failings of the elites, in a time when global warming, just to take one example, is still actively spun away by many of the media and other elites, in series of PR "big thinks" that would have done Edward Bernays proud. The echoes are those of ideas that have, at least since Lippmann and Bernays, mobilised the fear of the masses/the amateur/and ironically a fear of too much democracy itself, a democracy escaping from, and often brutally returned to, the control of "elites" since at least WW1. Such times - and such mobilisations of fear - were of course the cradle of the modern media industries themselves, and associated social sciences (from media and
communication studies, to sociology and, perhaps most importantly,
psychology - see Curtis' Century of the Self). Keen is therefore merely repeating the long history of media and social controls pitched against basic democracy (I don't mean communism here, I just mean democracy, as in voting even, as in the will of the people, etc).
<br><br>What does Keen want? Well he blogs and podcasts himself, so clearly he just wants to position himself among the bloggers ... he wants to assemble the basis for quick fame in the name of those who trade on media issues and fears, and via the conduits of the media industries who are always going to give this kind of thing a run ... while ignoring the ironic drop in basic standards of journalism that we now see in many parts of the world (down to the level of simple editing). And of course, all this is garnished with a crie de coeur concerning IP (we assume the "property" of the elites).
<br><br>What does he ignore? The fact that both traditional media and "web 2.0" are a mix of the amateur and the professional, the good and the bad. That once again, in this mix, the elites are starting to look like increasingly redundant Wizards of Oz. That IP is a complex affair of interests. etc
<br><br>It's not Keen, however, that we should be worried about. Despite the above, it's best to ignore him. We should rather be worried about a general,orchestrated "Keenism" one finds in the media these days as they 1. drop their own standards somewhat appallingly and 2. usually find it very difficult to deal with the kind of expertise a good blog/democratic media experience gathers around it. 3. project this outwards into the blogosphere.
<br><br>Of course, this is not how many journalists these days see it. Many are completely au fait with the whole social media deal (in fact, now we are getting a few younger journalists who have "grown up" with Web
2.0). Ironically, one sometimes suspects it is the general Keenism of some of the "elites" that stops the full "professional" expression that could (and despite everything, will) transform professional media. This transformation is currently happening and is increasingly fascinating.
<br><br>In the meantime, however, the attack on professionalism in the media is indeed to be lamented, but not along the lines, or for the personal gain, of Andrew Keen.<br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"Take me to the operator, I want to ask some questions" - Barbara Morgenstern
<br><br>"Of course it is always possible to work oneself into a state of complete contentment with an ultimate irrationality" - Alfred North Whitehead<br><br>"I thought I had reached port; but I seemed to be cast
<br>back again into the open sea" (Deleuze and Guattari, after Leibniz)<br><br>Dr Andrew Murphie - Senior Lecturer<br>School of Media, Film and Theatre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 2052<br>web:<a href="http://media.arts.unsw.edu.au/andrewmurphie/mysite/index.html">
http://media.arts.unsw.edu.au/andrewmurphie/mysite/index.html</a><br><a href="http://adventuresinjutland.wordpress.com/">http://adventuresinjutland.wordpress.com/</a><br><a href="http://researchhub.cofa.unsw.edu.au/ccap/">
http://researchhub.cofa.unsw.edu.au/ccap/</a><br>fax:612 93856812 tlf:612 93855548 email: <a href="mailto:a.murphie@unsw.edu.au">a.murphie@unsw.edu.au</a><br>room 311H, Webster Building