<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Anya, I think your book looks quite useful and I genuinely hope people use it. But I don't think anything in it positions you to criticize academia for not being 'punk rock'. Academia is not - of course - punk rock in any way. For not only does it not embody the values or behaviours or style of punk but it actually represents their antithesis. But then again academia never said it was punk rock. Whereas your book does claim that heritage. </div><div><br></div><div>I haven't been part of the Edupunk discourse in any way so I don't know how seriously anyone who uses it takes the punk thing, but in the context of the many radical DIY pedagogical possibilities enabled by the web I think it deserves to be taken quite seriously. Or at least as seriously (and not) as it took itself. Which isn't the case with your book.</div><div><br></div><div>For example, DIY training in order to gain certification from existing learning authorities can hardly be considered to reflect the DIY spirit of punk culture, yet that seems to be a very significant focus of your book. Again, I have no real problem with this. If people want to do it they should go for it. But the deeper possibilities are to explore how knowledge can be usefully located, generated and shared *outside* of existing knowledge-certification academies. Which also includes the possibility - indeed the likelihood - of being in direct conflict with those institutions, or of trying to achieve goals that are not supported by those institutions. In fact, punk rock went out of its way to constantly provoke those conflicts, and to both implicitly and explicitly highlight subversive epistemologies and non-conformist social values. So where is your chapter on hacking? Stealing degrees? Making plagiarism pay? Somehow I think Malcolm McLaren would have approached the Edupunk's guide with a little more panache. I mean, the Gates Foundation, really?</div><div><br></div><div>A more radical and authentic punk pedagogy in the age of the web would I think focus on radical personal creativity, explicit defiance of educational norms, the power of collective action, networked subversion, etc. A mashup of John Dewey, Kathy Acker and Julian Assange maybe. Whereas your book - useful as it may be - is a whole lot safer than a book with its title should be. Or could be. </div><div><br></div><div>js </div><br><div> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">--</font></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">www.johnsobol.com</font></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">bluesology • printopolis • digitopia</font></p> </div><br></body></html>