No subject


Tue Sep 18 10:10:38 UTC 2007


The blogosphere (and even the regular old
newspaper-sphere<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/30/technology/30face.html?ex=1354165200&en=f448f8a210da7bdf&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink>)
is alight with stories of Facebook's online advertising flop,
Beacon<http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14171>.
What can designers learn from this flop? It's not about privacy; it's about
the presentation of self. People have different "selves" for different
places -- virtual or otherwise -- and designs must be consistent with these
variety of selves.

Boing Boing's Cory Doctorow posted an interesting
story<http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=204203573&pgno=1&queryText%20=>on
InformationWeek that predicted the decline of Facebook because of its
own
success. He predicts that the more people that are one Facebook, the more
confusing it is. Your "creepy coworkers," your boss, and your friends you
met at Burning Man are all in the same "place," making it confusing,
embarrassing and difficult for everyone.

What Doctorow is really describing is sociologist Erving
Goffman's<http://del.icio.us/sladner/goffman>notion of "the front."
Using the theatre as a metaphor Goffman argued that
we actually "perform" multiple selves. Each place we go has a "front" that
we learn to incorporate. A front has a wardrobe, a setting, a decor,
make-up, a script and stage direction. We have a "front stage self" that we
perform for everyone to see, a "back stage self" for only our closest
intimates to see, and a "core self," which is deeply private.

A doctor, for example, has a front that includes an office, a lab coat, a
stethoscope and medical jargon. This is her "front stage" self. But when
she's talking to her best friend, she may use a "back stage self," being
less formal, not wearing a lab coat, or using less formal language. Her
"core" self is secretly wishing she were a full-time marathoner, but she
tells no one that.

Facebook's Beacon didn't work because it forces people to use multiple
fronts AT THE SAME TIME. If I tag a recipe from Epicurious.com, but I
broadcast that fact to friends that perceive me to be a party girl, I have a
collision of fronts. If my boss demands to be my friend, I have a collision
of fronts. If I rent The Notebook on Netflix, and my friends think I am a
Goth, I have a collision of fronts.

Facebook's Beacon forces its users to combine multiple selves. Goffman
considers the collision of fronts to be a source of embarrassment or shame.
Take, for example, the hilarious "Meeting in a Swimming
Pool"<http://www.justforlaughs.ca/videos/show/4052-en-pleine-r-union?page=12&stag=3>gag
on Just for Laughs. Swimmers have their swimming front (including a
bathing suit, casual demeanour) and forced into a meeting, with its serious
demeanour and fully clothed attendants. This is embarrassing.

Facebook has done the same thing by forcing its users to expose their selves
to different fronts simultaneously. It is embarrassing, even shameful.

*What Designers Can Learn From Facebook's Beacon*

   - *Discover your users' fronts:* If you are designing a product or a
   virtual place, ask your potential users what they consider the character of
   this "place" to be. Is is a formal place? Is it a casual atmosphere? What
   kinds of "props" are expected here? What would be an embarrassing topic of
   conversation or incident?
   - *Design using the theatre metaphor:* Make the product consistent
   with that place, as if you were writing a
play.<http://designresearch.wordpress.com/2007/07/26/designers-as-playwrights-scripting-design-outcomes/>Ensure
that what you design is part of a script that users understand or
   expect.
   - *Pay attention to embarrassment:* If your users mention shame or
   embarrassment in any way, gently press them about it. Discover the character
   of the "collision of fronts" that is the source of that embarrassment, and,
   above all, avoid forcing users to feel embarrassment.

------=_Part_5831_11615467.1196620855669
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hello all,<br>Trebor has asked that I share my recent blog post with the list. Here it is below.<br><br>From <a href="http://designresearch.wordpress.com/">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/</a>&nbsp; <br><p>The blogosphere (and even the regular 
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/30/technology/30face.html?ex=1354165200&amp;en=f448f8a210da7bdf&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">old newspaper-sphere</a>) is alight with stories of Facebook&#39;s 
<a href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14171">online advertising flop, Beacon</a>.
What can designers learn from this flop? It&#39;s not about privacy; it&#39;s
about the presentation of self. People have different &quot;selves&quot; for
different places -- virtual or otherwise -- and designs must be
consistent with these variety of selves.</p>
<p>Boing Boing&#39;s Cory Doctorow posted an <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=204203573&amp;pgno=1&amp;queryText%20=">interesting story</a>
on InformationWeek that predicted the decline of Facebook because of
its own success. He predicts that the more people that are one
Facebook, the more confusing it is. Your &quot;creepy coworkers,&quot; your boss,
and your friends you met at Burning Man are all in the same &quot;place,&quot;
making it confusing, embarrassing and difficult for everyone.</p>
<p>What Doctorow is really describing is sociologist <a href="http://del.icio.us/sladner/goffman">Erving Goffman&#39;s</a>
notion of &quot;the front.&quot; Using the theatre as a metaphor Goffman argued
that we actually &quot;perform&quot; multiple selves. Each place we go has a
&quot;front&quot; that we learn to incorporate. A front has a wardrobe, a
setting, a decor, make-up, a script and stage direction. We have a
&quot;front stage self&quot; that we perform for everyone to see, a &quot;back stage
self&quot; for only our closest intimates to see, and a &quot;core self,&quot; which
is deeply private.</p>
<p>A doctor, for example, has a front that includes an office, a lab
coat, a stethoscope and medical jargon. This is her &quot;front stage&quot; self.
But when she&#39;s talking to her best friend, she may use a &quot;back stage
self,&quot; being less formal, not wearing a lab coat, or using less formal
language. Her &quot;core&quot; self is secretly wishing she were a full-time
marathoner, but she tells no one that.</p>
<p>Facebook&#39;s Beacon didn&#39;t work because it forces people to use
multiple fronts AT THE SAME TIME. If I tag a recipe from
<a href="http://Epicurious.com">Epicurious.com</a>, but I broadcast that fact to friends that perceive me
to be a party girl, I have a collision of fronts. If my boss demands to
be my friend, I have a collision of fronts. If I rent The Notebook on
Netflix, and my friends think I am a Goth, I have a collision of fronts.</p>
<p>Facebook&#39;s Beacon forces its users to combine multiple selves.
Goffman considers the collision of fronts to be a source of
embarrassment or shame. Take, for example, the hilarious <a href="http://www.justforlaughs.ca/videos/show/4052-en-pleine-r-union?page=12&amp;stag=3">&quot;Meeting in a Swimming Pool&quot;</a>
gag on Just for Laughs. Swimmers have their swimming front (including a
bathing suit, casual demeanour) and forced into a meeting, with its
serious demeanour and fully clothed attendants. This is embarrassing.</p>
<p>Facebook has done the same thing by forcing its users to expose
their selves to different fronts simultaneously. It is embarrassing,
even shameful.</p>
<p><b>What Designers Can Learn From Facebook&#39;s Beacon</b></p>
<ul><li><b>Discover your users&#39; fronts:</b> If you are designing a product
or a virtual place, ask your potential users what they consider the
character of this &quot;place&quot; to be. Is is a formal place? Is it a casual
atmosphere? What kinds of &quot;props&quot; are expected here? What would be an
embarrassing topic of conversation or incident?</li><li><b>Design using the theatre metaphor:</b> Make the product consistent with that place, as if you were<a href="http://designresearch.wordpress.com/2007/07/26/designers-as-playwrights-scripting-design-outcomes/">
 writing a play.</a> Ensure that what you design is part of a script that users understand or expect.</li><li><b>Pay attention to embarrassment:</b> If your users mention shame
or embarrassment in any way, gently press them about it. Discover the
character of the &quot;collision of fronts&quot; that is the source of that
embarrassment, and, above all, avoid forcing users to feel
embarrassment.</li></ul>

<br>

------=_Part_5831_11615467.1196620855669--


More information about the iDC mailing list