[iDC] A Reflection on the Activist Strategies in the Web 2.0 Era
marc garrett
marc.garrett at furtherfield.org
Sat Jan 24 16:41:28 UTC 2009
Hi Ryan & all,
I would include furtherfield.org as an alternative to the more
traditional institutions - yet just like individual, experimental
artists need support from their communities, I would argue that we do
also...
marc
> On Jan 23, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Curt Cloninger wrote:
>
>
>> I suppose I am saying that once a "tactical media artist" puts work
>> in a gallery, a museum, or an arts festival, then that works gains
>> a strategic component -- because galleries, museums, and festivals,
>> and the practices of art production that surround them, fall within
>> the institutional realm that de Certeau is describing (although
>> some of these institutions and organizations are admittedly more
>> fluid/agile than others). And again, there is nothing ethically
>> wrong with this.
>>
>> I am trying to problematize de Certeau's binary distinction. Yes,
>> there is a continuum from the weak tactical consumer to the
>> stronger tactical artist producer, but that same continuum
>> continues on toward the systematic institutional producer, and I
>> don't think simply calling onesself a "tactical media artist"
>> excludes one from being considered a strategic media producer. Nor
>> should it. Nor should we always rule out stategic institutional
>> production as ethically off limits or pragmatically ineffectual. An
>> artist can and should implement a combination of multiple
>> production approaches/tactics/strategies (and indeed, this has
>> often been the case, regardless of what tactical media artists and
>> theorists have claimed).
>>
>
> i would quickly add to Curt's fluidity/continuum model the object of
> institutions. While there are dominant institutions that occupy space
> in a (seemingly) hegemonic manner - including museums, etc - there
> are counter institutions that colonize space (although, i'm not
> really keen on using that word in all instances) out of both
> necessity and desire and that can't be reduced to the tactical. i can
> understand the desire for tactical media to take on and try to embody
> the position of "the weak", but i think TM can be located in a
> broader field of cultural and political power, where it's tactical in
> more ways than one, i.e. "making due" with cultural capital in place
> of political power - part of the point of Brian's essay pointed to
> earlier.
> i think Curt is maybe after the matter of concern that such tactics
> are supposed to address, to go back to his reference to Latour? Which
> is hard to discuss in the limited vocabulary of tacticality...
>
> ryan
>
> _______________________________________________
> iDC -- mailing list of the Institute for Distributed Creativity (distributedcreativity.org)
> iDC at mailman.thing.net
> https://mailman.thing.net/mailman/listinfo/idc
>
> List Archive:
> http://mailman.thing.net/pipermail/idc/
>
> iDC Photo Stream:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/idcnetwork/
>
> RSS feed:
> http://rss.gmane.org/gmane.culture.media.idc
>
> iDC Chat on Facebook:
> http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2457237647
>
> Share relevant URLs on Del.icio.us by adding the tag iDCref
>
>
More information about the iDC
mailing list