[iDC] work, play, praxis
Nicholas Ruiz III
editor at intertheory.org
Fri Jul 3 13:20:52 UTC 2009
greetings ken/all...it seems to me that the hope of the gift is in its 'approach' rather than a targeted reality of static 'giftness' - the pure gift is absolutely unnecessary...Bataille's work showed that there is no special key to the general economy - even if he hoped otherwise. Baudrillard was insightful enough to indirectly develop the work-theory-play-exchange-praxis nexus toward the horizon with no line - this is why his later work evolved into aphorism, rather than tome - and is every bit as 'serious' as any of the longer pieces he wrote.
The systems in play today, in fact, are crystallizations of exactly the kind of exchange that you describe as enabling - I see these as the function of a metaphysics of capital, where the gift implies a return, the game is always on, we are always capitalists, even as we cultivate new emancipatory social formations, and even as we seek new social structures via cultural and political production (under any name) - the film 'Milk' shows this nexus rather well, I think. Progress is the tender trap we must fall for...
The 'effort to transform a world which is at the same time self-transforming' that you speak of, Soros describes as a function of a 'reflexivity' forever part of our negotiation with the real - and he mentions it recently in terms of Enlightenment and the Postmodern! Rather interesting, I think, and unexpected for some that may stereotype 'capitalists':
To answer your questions:
"To what extent are global relations of praxis (game, gift, work, and
yes, still also slavery) interconnected? To what extent does the detour
through difference bring us back to processes within which we are all
I would want to say that the 'nexus' is really not there, only when we highlight it, or point it out - that is, they are more than interconnected, they are one and the same, and a function of the quantum entanglement that 'physics' enjoys (or laments). The detour through difference is no detour at all, but a 'real-ization' - that only brings us to ourselves, faced with our human condition(s).
pax et lux and happy independence day weekend!
Nicholas Ruiz III, Ph.D
NRIII for Congress 2010
----- Original Message ----
From: Ken Wark <warkk at newschool.edu>
To: idc at mailman.thing.net
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2009 1:42:44 PM
Subject: [iDC] work, play, praxis
I want to pick up on something Paul Miller said, if somewhat indirectly. I was reading Shershow's book on The Work and the Gift, and while its synoptic power is very great, the gift section really is quite unsatisfactory. He follows Derrida's amazing text on the gift, which shows quite powerfully how the pure gift is an impossibility. The gift as act of generosity without thought of return can't exist. But Shershow uses this pretext to dismiss the gift altogether. If the gift can't be the special key to a general economy, then it is nothing.
Mauss wanted to use the gift as a critical tool for undermining the centrality of the commodity and of exchange. In doing so he puts the non-western once again at the heart of debates about, for want of a better name, the philosophy of praxis. Shershow's dismissal of the gift seals up western discourse in itself, once again.
Of all the readings of Mauss he discusses, one he omits is Henri Lefebvre. For Lefebvre, the gift doesn't have to be pure. It can be a tactic in a strategy, a moment of contestation. In short (borrowing from Huizinga) he puts the game alongside both gift and exchange as relevant forms of praxis. This i find extraordinarily enabling. The gift does not have to be a complete utopian alternative to the commodity, particularly if thought throught the game. Lefebvre does not add, but it is a consequence, that the non-western is freed to some extent then from its special but disabling status as 'other'.
Praxis, then: here I want to mention, by way of responding to Paul, Susan Buck-Morss's book Hegel, Haiti and Universal History (Pittsburgh, 2009). Its about Hegel's master-slave dialectic. In short, she shows pretty conclusively that Hegel is really writing about the revolution in Haiti. His 'slaves' are not a metaphor, or an idea from Aristotle. He is writing philosophy as world history.
This i think really changes the way one thinks the master-slave dialectic (not to mention its influential re-readings, by for example Kojeve). One is talking very directly then about the slave's accepting the challenge of death, of taking the skills acquired in laboring with nature and turning them against domination. This is not a metaphor, or not only a metaphor. It is an event in world history. The revolution in Haiti.
What does this have to do with work and play? As Lefebvre says, work is only one kind of praxis. And praxis might be the key term to be thought. By praxis i might mean something like a collective effort to transform a world which is at the same time self-transforming. And to think about praxis one might need to break open the provincialism of how it is thought in the west, where the non-west just appears in the supporting role of 'other'.
The really challenging term in Buck-Morss' book is 'universal history'. To what extent are global relations of praxis (game, gift, work, and yes, still also slavery) interconnected? To what extent does the detour through difference bring us back to processes within which we are all enmeshed?
McKenzie Wark, Associate Professor of Media Studies, Eugene Lang College and the New School for Social Research
iDC -- mailing list of the Institute for Distributed Creativity (distributedcreativity.org)
iDC at mailman.thing.net
iDC Photo Stream:
iDC Chat on Facebook:
Share relevant URLs on Del.icio.us by adding the tag iDCref
More information about the iDC