[iDC] tenure and visibility
jhopkins at neoscenes.net
Tue Apr 5 13:41:32 EDT 2005
>while there are problems with the tenure process - it's ability to
>turn peers into micromanagers and judges - to suggest that
>non-tenure teaching is a real alternative for most people is
>ridiculous (private schools that have full time contracts
>independent of tenure excepted).
>part timers aren't hired because they're "innovative" anymore than
>indonesians are for being master shoe makers. and many adjuncts are
>finding that growing grad programs are providing a labor pool that
>accepts even less money - in fact they're pretty much paying for
>their own experience.
>the tenure process may turn many of the people going through it into
>self-obsessed walking CVs, but commuting to 3+ different schools to
>make just above minimum wage with no health benefits and no
>guarantee of a job next term (not too mention where the people you
>work "with" don't even know who you are) can do something to you
>too. i'll take a few faculty meetings if it means i can afford to go
>to the dentist and the doctor if needed.
My intent wasn't to suggest that adjunct is a nice way of going --
the entire system is problematic to put it politely... and it
appears that neither aspect tenure/adjunct are in any way designed
for the uplifting social possibilities (safe position to engage in
strong social critique, f. ex., or flexible working options for
second wage-earner), but only for the continuence of the
institutional structure as one element of a larger production system
for skilled 'workers'...
More information about the iDC