[iDC] Art
Kevin Hamilton
kham at uiuc.edu
Mon Dec 12 00:15:00 EST 2005
I appreciate the efforts of recent posts to identify specific
subject/objects,
And the acknowledgement of the academic context as a site ripe for action.
Just wanted to add this question: Beyond civil disobedience as a tactic,
has anyone come across discussion of pacifism in relation to new media
and activism?
Pacfism sometimes resembles a "third way" between strategy and tactics -
literally, in the case of the Christian Peacemaker Teams, who step
between tactical rock-throwing and strategic troop deployment in
Palestine. For some of their members, the motto "getting in the way"
came fully true this week when they were captured in Iraq.
Not something I can claim as my own way of life, but I remain interested
in what pacifism has to offer to some of the confrontations described in
this thread.
I'm speaking here not only of Civil Disobedience as a tactic, but of
pacifism in the anabaptist sense - what I understand to be a deeply held
and lived belief:
-that (short of heaven or Christ's return) power will always prevail
-that (again, on this earth) the powerful will always overlook and abuse
the disempowered
-that efforts to aid the disempowered must then come from
extra-governmental action
Pacifists sometimes seem to be the most active people around. What reads
as fatalism to some is a call to action for others.
I haven't made it far enough in Hardt and Negri to discover where, as
Kester pointed out, they dismiss NGO's. And I have no history with
direct activism.
But I do share many of the concerns expressed in this discussion so far,
especially as a professor in new media at a research university.
Subjectivity, still never fully granted to so many, seems to be under
attack for those to whom it was granted. I understand and can see the
role of specific material, media decisions in this process. Hacktivism,
culture-jamming, tactical media, all excite me and inform my teaching.
de Certeau, the Situationists, took hold of me strongly as a student.
But in addition to some of the concerns about "effectiveness" expressed
here and in my classrooms,
I also wonder about how many tactical actions are damned to mirror the
strategies they attack, and thus to bolster or even repeat power. I
wonder whether we might learn from pacifism some alternatives to this,
whether violence is the problem.
Would you be sorry to discover GI-Joe dolls in the closet of a media
tactician? (And I don't mean the ones used for Barbie Liberation.)
All this humbly submitted by someone who has not lived this discussion
as long or deeply as others who have posted here, and whose thoughts I
have very much learned from this week.
Kevin Hamilton
More information about the iDC
mailing list