[iDC] re: "Praxis-based" Ph.Ds
andrew mount
andrew at thinc.org
Wed Jan 17 12:51:19 EST 2007
Hello there Margaret and all who have posted to the PhD discussion,
I have been following the discussion avidly but have no time to commit to a
lengthy answer as yet..but I just wanted to point out 2 things:
This discussion thread will be archived by the mailman program that enables
this listserve, so it will always be around
If preferable I would be happy to set up a wiki that could include all
individual posts in chronological order as an archive of sorts, and this
would allow and encourage further exploration of the subject. Just looking
at the number and quality of posts in this thread supports the assumption
that this discussion has been in need for a good long time. Further I think
we could easily say that all those positing and even more like myself who
are watching at the moment are very glad its finally happening.
Lets have a vote about the wiki? I can set it up easily and circulate the
url.
Best
Andrew
On 1/17/07 12:03 PM, "Margaret Morse" <memorse at comcast.net> wrote:
> Dear IDCs,
>
> after I posted my thought to make a handbook or digest of concerns
> and information (not the great exchanges taking place in your own
> words] for my own use, I wondered how to do it. If my
> digest/handbook got any further than my own computer or the list
> itself, is it kosher to pass on the digest (aside from its reduced
> and abstract style} to immediate colleagues while respecting the
> privacy and property rights of posters? if I did collate ideas and
> concerns about the praxis-based Ph.D., whom would I credit--the IDC
> listserve or the list of people who specifically participated? Would
> the names be next to ideas or in a list of credits?
>
> Mark posted his concerns about his ideas he is working on for his
> book. While some people post every idea they have on their websites,
> in other cases it makes sense to withhold one's hard work from
> dissemination until publication.
>
> Don't know if I will indeed digest this as anonymous content
> (otherwise I could simply cut and paste your words), but I realized
> that this isn't simple. It has ramifications.
More information about the iDC
mailing list