[iDC] please make comments regarding semantic overlay term

[Sandy Klausner]

Danny,

"If the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail"

The industry can do much better at the foundation level ...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: images.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2353 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.thing.net/pipermail/idc/attachments/20080316/f2eaa1f6/attachment.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------


Cheers,
Sandy


On Mar 16, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Danny Ayers wrote:

On 16/03/2008, Paul Prueitt <psp at ontologystream.com> wrote:
>
>  Claimed as a fact:  The W3C standards have foundational errors which
>  will not support knowledge sharing beyond a certain point.

It may well be that the W3C standards will not support knowledge
sharing beyond a certain point - but we're a long, long way off that
point. We're only a decade or so into the document Web, and yet still
innovations are occurring there. The more generalized data Web that
Semantic Web technologies enable promise a massive expansion of
opportunities.

I'm not sure quite what you have in mind with "foundational errors" -
the maths behind RDF etc is fairly well known, although software
modeling of real-world or conceptual systems is almost always
imperfect. The entity-relationship style of modeling has proven itself
very useful in traditional systems, and RDF offers a way of doing this
which is built on the same foundations as the Web (in short: give
entities URIs; give relationships URIs - see also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_Data).

It may be the case that the designs and base architectures underlying
virtually all software systems is flawed. Yet still those systems can
be useful.

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 
http://dannyayers.com
~
http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/this_weeks_semantic_web/