[thingist] REBOOTING THE THING - some thoughts
kasbah at thing.net
Mon Jul 20 16:23:48 UTC 2015
long time to see.
the following discussion started 2 weeks ago at Wolfgang's place in
Berlin and we decided to put it into a bigger circle of like-minded,
interested thing members....
I wantto quickly reflect on a few points.
There was a repeatedly stated desire not only from W but from many
others, to bring back The Thing as an active platform for many different
reasons and certainly for a number of different activities - A moderated
(filtered) event announcement board, art criticism, and a discussion
forum for all who stay away from Social Media for the obvious reasons.
But also for activities that would not replicate what all others in the
world are doing so avidly.
Could it even possible become a mini Social Network for a like-minded
community (and reviving the existing THING community) ?
A few points:
*secure yet subversive*
And along these lines we discussed pgp aspects, the beta version of new
open source mail program mail pile and other alternatives to Google
controlled communication platforms that could be implemented.
Pit mentioned how one could link THING as a site/platform to FB without
a full submission however not to bypass the option of making use of
existing social media sites as springboards.
To paraphrase Walter, he mentioned that for him the importance of the
Thing’s legacy was beside the “pioneer factor” it’s continuing
uniqueness allowing political involvement and activity on the web that
was impossible elsewhere, and he felt that this is an essential aspect
which could / should be continued.
But what else? How could all this be bundled in an unusual way, not to
look like a .gif animation happy hipster infotainment site but also
not like a dusty blog.
And speaking of the latter: The sad (Drupal?) interface of
post.thing.net is for me a literal PostThing.net ...bit of a Dorn im
Auge it make me already 5 years ago initiate (unsuccessfully) a similar
*content? appearance? *
So besides the basic idea on WHAT and HOW this all should materialize,
it seems relevant to ask what issues should be prioritized at the same
time how this then should look like?
Regarding this Marc’s and Ruth’s Furtherfield was for me - not so long a
go- still a highly interesting model to study, although nowadays I am
more and more questioning the self-imposed limitations that come with
the strict focus on networked culture. I nowadays are more excited about
an "all-inclusive" framework ....needless to say one that is somehow
balanced between deep, witty art criticism, activism..and otherwise wild
things (i.e. a la MOUSSE, etc)
Pit brought up the possibility to find support right within the dead
center of the commercial art world, collectors and art patrons that
could be won as sponsors.
We discussed how labor of love works for a limited amount of time for
certain people and how essential a long form support structure is. W …
sorry to repeat issues that are as old as THE THING, question is what
kind of individual donation support can still be found in todays
German/European landscape within such a multitude of cultural
activities, crowd funding culture, etc.
Feel free to correct whatever I didn’t mentioned or sounds off.
It would be nice to hear from all others some key ideas, what anybody
imagines the THING to be like and also to what extend you could get
I guess apart from an already forming work group re the technical
aspect, among all mentioned aspects a second work group could think
about interface design - and all of us should throw concrete ideas for
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the thingist