[iDC] Re: The politics of cultural production
saul ostrow
sostrow at gate.cia.edu
Sun Aug 27 09:42:20 EDT 2006
I want to thank Christiane and Matthew for there responses to my
missive - its good to know others feel as I do - and that for the
moment while we have more questions than answers, that others are
willing to acknowledge that our present condition can no longer be
addressed using out-moded conventions and readymade answers premised
on dualistic and instrumental thought or the promise of a
technological solution. Equally important we must understand that
social and political engagement is not about developing art forms but
creating a environment that can sustain a dynamic virtual, collective
cultural identity that is significantly different than the one that
our present culture is premised on.
As for Matthew's question concerning emerging non- traditional forms
of protest - my observation is that too many non- traditional forms
have traditional content (and continue to be premised on the view
that the truth will make us free) - in other words its about
getting the message out - but what is the message - from my point of
view, first thing we need to rid ourselves of is the notion of
protest - its too negative - its reactive and is premised on the
vision that if the bad goes away the good will take its place- which
is a mode of instrumental thought which does not offer us a vision of
what it is we might actually want or how to achieve it - another
thing we need to recuperate the term propagandist - and develop
forms that propagate programatic alternatives, as well as new
visions and rules of engagement - Let us for the moment take a big
issue the opposition to globalization - if one opposes it they are
denying reality, this includes those who oppose it in the name of a
romantic view of other non modern culture's in the name of self-
determination - If we are serious in our opposition then we must
offer up- propose alternative forms of development within the context
of the existing global economy-- this would be a real act of
opposition - the problem, seems to be is that the latter because it
lacks a ready made position from which to be indignant, is less
emotionally rewarding - one last thing remember marx thought that
capital's ability to form global systems was a positive - it was
imperialism's abuse of these systems whcih created poverty and
despotism that was the negative aspect.
More information about the iDC
mailing list